Category: Personal Business Identity


Color offers an instantaneous method for conveying meaning and message. Our minds are programmed to respond to color. We stop our cars for red lights and go on green, we look at the color of certain plants and animals to determine whether or not they are safe for us to eat or touch, the bottom line is that color is a very important part of our daily lives. Symbolic meanings of colors have psychological connotations. Nevertheless, colors effect us psychologically regardless of any symbolism. And the psychological effect of one color can be very different from its symbolical significance.

If you understand the psychological effects of colors, you can employ them  deliberately. While perceptions of color are somewhat subjective, there are some color effects that have universal meaning. Colors in the red area of the color spectrum are known as warm colors and include red, orange and yellow. These warm colors evoke emotions ranging from feelings of warmth and comfort to feelings of anger and hostility. Colors trigger a variety of emotions and memories. The interpretation of color depends on age, profession, nationality, and personal preference.

Here are some general interpretations of colour psychology;

RED
Positive: Physical courage, strength, warmth, energy, basic survival, ‘fight or flight’, stimulation, masculinity, excitement.
Negative: Defiance, aggression, visual impact, strain.

YELLOW
Positive: Optimism, confidence, self-esteem, extraversion, emotional strength, friendliness, creativity.
Negative: Irrationality, fear, emotional fragility, depression, anxiety, suicide.

GREEN
Positive: Harmony, balance, refreshment, universal love, rest, restoration, reassurance, environmental awareness, equilibrium, peace.
Negative: Boredom, stagnation, blandness, enervation.

PINK.
Positive: Physical tranquillity, nurture, warmth, femininity, love, sexuality, survival of the species.
Negative: Inhibition, emotional claustrophobia, emasculation, physical weakness.

GREY.
Positive: Psychological neutrality.
Negative: Lack of confidence, dampness, depression, hibernation, lack of energy.

BLACK.
Positive: Sophistication, glamour, security, emotional safety, efficiency, substance.
Negative: Oppression, coldness, menace, heaviness.

WHITE.
Positive: Hygiene, sterility, clarity, purity, cleanness, simplicity, sophistication, efficiency.
Negative: Sterility, coldness, barriers, unfriendliness, elitism.

BLUE.
Positive: Intelligence, communication, trust, efficiency, serenity, duty, logic, coolness, reflection, calm.
Negative: Coldness, aloofness, lack of emotion, unfriendliness.

So the main reason I chose blue for my logo is because of the word – Thought = intellect, logic and intelligence. Also blue is the overwhelming “favorite color.” Blue is seen as trustworthy, dependable and committed. The color of sky and the ocean, blue is perceived as a constant in our lives.

Many people have used blue to convey intelligence, here are but a few examples;

I have not even scratched the surface of colour theory, but if you wish to delve deeper then the following sites are a good place to start.

Because a – no one could see the figure without me pointing it out; and b – it wasn’t necessary, I took the question and exclamation mark out of the design, simplifying the design. And created this 3-colour design to show how it would work in colour on both black and white background, and that it would work in black and white on either background

My reasons for choosing blue can be found in the post – Why So Blue.

Then in further discussions I found out that people didn’t see the speech balloon shape, even though I can’t help but see it. But the shape was pleasing and the backwards ‘g’ ‘h’ and ‘t’ still received the ‘amused’ response that I wanted. So I created one final iteration –

Then I began to experiment with colour in greater detail. For the purposes of cost and efficiency, I looked into the Pantone colour; matte to be specific.

In the end I decided on Pantone Solid Matte 298M and the font is Gills Sans Ultra Bold.

Towards the end of my design sketches I started to experiment with the use of question marks and exclamation marks, as can be seen in my last post of my design journal. While doing this I noticed that, when put together the right way, you can kind of make it look like a person. That lead to the sketch below.

The illusion's not quite there.

After sketching this I began experimenting with what is supposed to be the speech bubble.

Then it was suggested to me that I should try using fonts that already exist to create the design.

After sorting through fonts for a question mark that will enhance my concept, I combined it with the font ‘Gill Sans’ to create the iteration below.

Checking out various ?

.

Then I messed around with the placements of the elements to see if the effect held up.

Click on image to see other great movie posters

Good design means as little design as possible. If you can remove an element within a design and that design still works, then you’ve practiced economy in design. There are no rules for using economy, if an element works in the composition with respect to the whole design, it should be kept. If it distracts from the desired effect, it should be re-evaluated for its purpose.

Graphic design is for identification, information, presentation and promotion. Economy of design furthers the concept of telling a short story with images. Everything needs to justify its continued existence. If you wish to retain something for the sake of tradition let that be a conscious decision.

This is a key goal in the case of user interfaces as economy breeds simplicity. Taking away from an interface means that there is less for a user to understand. Simplicity does not mean simplistic solutions, lack of functionality or limited information

“Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.” – Leonardo Da Vinci.

Below are some logos that I have gathered which show economy in design.

For some more opinions on Economy and Simplicity, visit the following sites;

‘In Om we have no word for slave,’ said Vorbis.
‘So I understand,’ said the Tyrant. ‘I imagine that fish have no word for water.’
— Terry Pratchett – ‘Small Gods’.

You can’t name a thing that could not be contrasted to some other thing based on any of its aspects: color, size, shape, font, texture, etc. A word does not need to be created for a state of being that has no opposite. Up – Down. Light – Dark. Alive – Dead.

This artist goes by the name Nebezial

Contrast occurs when two elements are different. The greater the difference the greater the contrast. The key to working with contrast is to make sure the differences are obvious. Four common methods of creating contrast are by using differences in size, value, color, and type.

Contrast in design is an accentuation of the differences between elements in a design. Most people think of contrast only as it applies to colors, but contrast can work with any design element. For example, if you have a group of lines that are all the same size, there is no contrast. But if one is a lot longer than the others, it contrasts with them.

If all the art elements are the same, the result is monotonous and unexciting. Contrast aids in readability by making headlines and subheadings stand out. Contrast shows what is important by making smaller or lighter elements recede on the page to allow other elements to take center stage.

Contrast is most effective when it is strong; the focal point of a design is usually a result of contrast where the eyes will naturally be drawn. It is important to remember that an ineffective use of contrast may result in confusion.

Below I have posted logos that I have found that have strong contrast.

For more information and opinions on the use f contrast in design check out the following sites;

Variety provides contrast to harmony and unity and consists of the differences in objects that add interest to a visual image. Variety can be achieved by using opposites or strong contrasts, changing the size, point of view, and angle of a single object can or breaking a repeating pattern can enliven a visual image.

In the Valley - Jasper F. Cropsey

By varying the components of a visual design, the artist creates interest and avoids monotony. A way of accomplishing this is to establish an approach which involves theme and variations-repeating the same image, but in different sizes, colors, values and shapes. Variety is the complement to unity and is needed to create visual interest. Without unity, an image is chaotic and “unreadable;” without variety it is dull and uninteresting. In Cropsey’s painting on the left, ‘In the Valley’, the large tree creates a variety in contrast to the architecture in the distance, creating a visually pleasing image.

Good design is achieved through the balance of unity and variety; the elements need to be alike enough so we perceive them as belonging together and different enough to be interesting. An effective way to integrate unity and variety is by creating variations on a theme. Just as a composer can repeat and vary a musical theme throughout a composition, a designer can repeat and vary an element throughout a design.

Below is some work from other designers that shows the use of variety –

Some more information on variety can be found at the following sites;

Unity discusses the need to tie the various elements of a work of art together. A unified work of art represents first a whole, then the sum of its parts. When all the elements in a work look as though they belong together, the artist has achieved unity.

You know unity has been achieved when all aspects of the design complement one another rather than compete for attention. All of the design principles (balance, movement, emphasis, visual economy, contrast, proportion and space) have been correctly applied. Everything selected for use in a composition must complement the key theme and must also serve some functional purpose within the design.

American Gothic

Unity can be achieved through the use of;

  • Similarity of shape, colour, line, ect
  • Proximity
  • Repetition
  • Alignment
  • Continuation
  • Consistent use of graphic elements

When unity is achieved:

  • The individual elements with in a composition will not be competing for attention.
  • The key theme will be communicated more clearly.
  • The design will evoke a sense of completeness and organization.
  • When nothing can distract from the whole you have unity.

The well-known painting “American Gothic” shows unity in its repeditive use of elongated curves and similar colours.

Unity in composition is hard to achieve, but below are a couple of logo whose designers at least came close.

More info on unity in art can be found as these sites;

After coming up with a name for my company, I began brainstorming ideas. After looking at some of the ‘would-be’ competitors and there logos/marketing. I found a few Australian companies on the web and learnt that the more entertainment based designers had animated logos.

From this I decided that I decided that I should come up with animated logo for my animation company. In the first concept I had thoughts, (the letters spelling “Random Thought” falling out of a box. A play on the cliché ‘Thinking outside the box’. In the top left hand corner of the image below, you can see where I sketched this first idea.

If you follow the arrows you may notice how the design evolved through slight iteration in typography, (except for the brain design, I have no idea where that came from), into the full-page sketch below.

'Thought' created with pen tool.

After taking this design into Illustrator, I sat down and drew up a few different iterations.

These images lead to the two iteration below and a third idea that will be discussed in the next post of my design journal.

A visual representation of human needs.

Maslow’s hierarchy of needs refers to what people need to survive and be happy. They are listed in order of importance and having any of them is irrelevant unless you have all the predeceasing needs. Maslow’s hierarchy of needs is most often displayed as a pyramid,  (like the one on the left). The lowest levels of the pyramid are made up of the most basic needs, while the more complex needs are located at the top of the pyramid. Needs at the bottom of the pyramid are basic physical requirements including the need for food, water, sleep and warmth. Once these lower-level needs have been met, people can move on to the next level of needs, which are for safety and security. As people progress up the pyramid, needs become increasingly psychological and social. Soon, the need for love, friendship and intimacy become important. Further up the pyramid, the need for personal esteem and feelings of accomplishment take priority.

When it comes to design, the hierarchy of needs is quite different but, just like Maslow’s, they still need to be met in order. That order is;

Functionality – The most basic of needs. If a design does not achieve its intended function, then it doesn’t matter if it meets every other need in this list, it’s still a failure.

Reliability – Once a design meets its function, it needs to be able to continue to do this consistently through its lifespan. It should function the same way every time it is used.

Usability – We now move into the less important needs of a design. Usability refers to how easy a product is to use and how forgiving the design is towards the user. This is an important need of design, but if you have to sacrifice usability to achieve the previous two needs, then the users can get past this.

Proficiency – If your design allows people to do things better than they could before then you have achieved proficiency. Proficiency is a great selling point for a product and people will favour any product that can delivery this.

Creativity – The last and hardest need to achieve. Creativity can only be brought in if all other needs are met. The design has reached a level where user can interact, bringing their own skills and ideas into the use of a product.

The flats of London

In London, England in an attempt to solve the housing problem local councils built up buildings that came to be known as council flats. Citizens suffering financial hardships were delegated a flat and lived with the council as the landlord.

The problem with this solution was that only architecture, money and space were taken into consideration when designing the flats. Politicians believed that people would acclimatize themselves with life in these flats. But, as the hierarchy of needs was not considered, life inside these flats is hard and depressing.

The flats achieve their function and provide the basic physical requirements. Only the bottom layer of both ‘needs pyramids’ have been met. They do not feel safe or secure, nor give the residences a feeling of belonging, as they don’t actually own the place where they live. The reliability and usability are terrible as the flats are poorly made and maintained. None of the other needs can even be discussed in relation to these buildings.

Further information on these topics can be found at these sites;

Below are my attempts at creating a logo using the different laws of gestalt. Except for the last image which was something made during a class exercise.